Also, only capacity of a single drive is available to you. RAID 5. In the event of a single drive failure, data is pieced together using the parity information stored on the other drives.
There is zero downtime. Read speed is very fast but write speed is somewhat slower due to the parity that has to be calculated. It is ideal for file and application servers that have a limited number of data drives.
The most popular RAID 5 configurations use four drives, which lowers the lost storage space to 25 percent. It can work with up to 16 drives. RAID 6. That means it requires at least 4 drives and can withstand 2 drives dying simultaneously. If you're not learning you're not living though, right? Brand Representative for StarWind.
Also in RAID6 you have to calculate parity twice which depending on your controller is negligible or a big performance loss. If you use the cheap Raid Controller, you will have very low write Performance if you use Raid 6 or 5. Raid 6 was a lot faster than Raid 10 with this config. Drawback of Raid 6 is that you will have a way longer rebuild time if you have a faulty drive.
Performance will be a bit slower too in that case. They are way to slow. Better would be to use some SAS 10k drives. The other 10 drives are just mirrors of the other I believed that Raid 10 is faster for years, but this doesnt seem to be true anymore with the new Generations of Raid Controllers anymore.
CPUs on those are so fast that parity calculations doesnt lower the Overall Performance anymore. We did a online conversion of our Raid10 config to Raid5 and it was performing a lot faster. Your understanding of RAID10 is flawed, as well. To continue this discussion, please ask a new question.
Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Any thoughts? And thanks in advance! Best Answer. Pure Capsaicin. If you need the capacity, then RAID 6 is the choice.
View this "Best Answer" in the replies below ». Popular Topics in Data Storage. Spiceworks Help Desk. Please note that the parity data is not stored in a specific individual disk. As the above picture shows, the parity data is stored randomly in all disks. In addition, the parity data has relationship with data stored on other disks. It is generated according to the data stored on other disks. The formula is as follows:. When any data between A1 and A2 is lost, the lost data can be recovered by utilizing the remaining data and the parity data.
For example, when A1 is lost, the specific recovery formula is as follows:. However, when two disks fail, RAID 5 cannot recover the data. To solve this problem, RAID 6 comes out. RAID 6, whose full name is "independent data disks with two independent distributed parity schemes", has two independent parity data blocks. Therefore, it needs at least 4 drives. When it is composed of 4 drives, its structure is shown like the following picture:. Two disks are used to store parity data P and Q and other disks are used to store data like striped volume.
In RAID 6, the parity formulas are as follows:. GF, short for Galois Field, is a mathematical algorithm. When data errors or data loss occurs on only one disk, the recovery method is the same as RAID5. RAID 6 will not use the second formula the Q parity method. Only when data errors or loss happens to two disks, the Q parity GF algorithm is needed, which is used to build a simultaneous equation.
How to manage hard drive RAID safely and effectively? The divisor is 2, because RAID 10 contains mirrored volumes that require writing the same data twice. Similarly, represent the number of disks with N and read speed with X. When disk failures occur, you should replace disk and rebuild the RAID. For RAID 10, its rebuild speed is faster, because it only has to copy from the surviving mirror to rebuild a drive.
As for RAID 6, it takes much more time to rebuild the array after a disk failure, because it needs to calculate parity.
0コメント